가. 기초사실 C은 2014. 5. 10. 16:00 음주상태에서 D 그랜드스타렉스 차량(이하 ‘피고 차량’이라 한다)을 운전하여 화성시 E 아파트 앞 사거리 도로를 제부도 방면에서 남양 수원 방면으로 진행하던 중, 신호대기로 정차 중이던 F 봉고 차량 뒷부분을 피고 차량의 앞부분으로 충격하였고 이에 위 봉고 차량이 앞으로 튕겨나가면서 도로에 설치된 신호기 시설물을 충격하게 되었다

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff, who was on board the wing chief of the said vehicle due to the said accident, suffered injuries, such as double alleys, etc.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, or is obvious to the court, Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant, the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the above accident, barring any special circumstance, since the plaintiff sustained an injury due to the operation of the defendant vehicle.

Although the defendant asserted the limitation of liability due to the failure of the plaintiff's safety labelling, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no fault on the part of the victim that can be considered in calculating the amount of damages in this case.

2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

At the time of the accident, the amount of damages shall be calculated at the rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct interim interest.

It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute or significant fact in the court, evidence Nos. 8 through 19, evidence Nos. 2 through 9, G hospital head, H hospital head, I Medical Director, and J hospital head, and each fact-finding result.