The Defendant is the actual owner of a multi-family housing in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do.

The Defendant, as bad credit bad credit holders, was faced with financial difficulties due to investment in the E main points located in D, and was willing or ability to pay the investment to the said main points without the intention or ability to pay the investment to the new lessee, and was willing to use the rent deposit received from the lessee to make an investment in the said main points.

1. Around February 14, 2016, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F of the instant multi-household housing No. 401, stating that “The existing tenants are all the monthly tenants, and the market price is KRW 2 billion due to the G pent in the spawn, with a view to not being refunded the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the victim.”

However, in fact, the previous tenants are all tenants with the total amount of KRW 312 million, and the principal of the secured loan was 2.3 million, while the market price of the above multi-family housing was 500 million won so that the victims could not return the deposit for the lease. The 1 parcel, 12 parcel, 12 parcel, and J 2 parcel, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, the defendant was held in the name of the defendant at the time, and there was no property value due to the two provisional seizure. The other tenants paid interest for the loan with the deposit for the lease because there was no specific income other than the deposit for the lease from the other tenants, so even if they received the deposit for the lease for the lease, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Therefore, the Defendant, as seen above, received the total sum of KRW 2 million from the victim, KRW 4.5 million around the same day from the victim, KRW 4.5 million around the 15th of the same month, KRW 45 million around March 8, 2016, and KRW 65 million around the 18th of the same month, and KRW 13.5 million from the same month.

2. On January 15, 2016, the Defendant for fraud against the Victim K is a victim K at the same place as above, and “The existing tenants are both a half-month tenant, and thus the deposit is returned.”