If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 02:30 on June 17, 2014, the Defendant, within the D cafeteria located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu, and was talking with the victim E (Inn, 44 years old) and drinking in the past related person E (inn, 44 years old).

The defendant expressed her bath to the victim and the victim expressed her face to the face of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant blicked the son's face while blicking the son's disease on the face of the victim, blicking the victim's right side one time with the left hand, and blicking the victim's face face requiring treatment for about 21 days, and blicking the victim's face and blicking it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some of the accused's legal statement [the purport that the accused has been dead at the time of imprisonment with prison labor];

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The results of the reproduction and viewing of CCTV video data [the defendant and his defense counsel]. Since the victim's act was first committed against the defendant at the time of drinking and scambling, it cannot be deemed that the defendant's act was caused by the defendant's assault that requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and the defendant's act is not illegal as a passive defensive act. However, in full view of the above evidence, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant's act was committed by assaulting the victim as stated in the judgment of the court, and it cannot be deemed that the defendant's act was for defending the present unfair infringement or that it is merely a passive defensive act. Accordingly, the above argument cannot be accepted).

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;