However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[2016고단2787] 피고인은 2016. 6. 17. 01:18경 서울 양천구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 앞 노상에서, 자신이 부른 대리기사인 피해자 D(남, 51세)을 약 10여분 간 기다리게 한 다음 취소비도 주지 않고 취소하였다가 위 피해자로부터 “양아치네”라는 말을 듣게 되자 화가 나, 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴, 목, 가슴을 수회 때리고, 낭심을 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

[2016 Highest 3553] On June 23, 2016, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the wall surface in a way that he/she renders meals and accounts at the Chinese house for the operation of the victim F, located in the apartment building located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-gu, and took meals within the same restaurant, and thereby raising the cafeteria in the same restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 2787]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of D [2016 Height3553]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of G and H prepared;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 266 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The extent of damage and damage to property in sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act shall be minor and agreed with the victim, the defendant has been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, degree of damage, recovery of damage and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the overall circumstances;