A. The plaintiff was rendered a favorable judgment against the defendant in the Daegu District Court Port Branch 2005Gahap942 Claims 2005Gahap942.

B. Although the above judgment became final and conclusive, the plaintiff is about 10 years without receiving any repayment from the defendant for the principal and interest.

C. Accordingly, this lawsuit is instituted for the interruption of prescription following the completion of extinctive prescription of the claim for reimbursement, for which the above judgment became final and conclusive.

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);