교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (in its imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, two years suspended execution, 40 hours during a compliance driving instruction, and 80 hours during social service) is too uneasy and unreasonable.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the arguments in this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records, the lower court’s punishment appears to have been appropriately determined by fully considering various reasons for sentencing asserted by the prosecutor, and there is no special circumstance to the extent that the sentencing is to be changed ex post facto (in the case of the Defendant, by agreement with the victim, the injured party does not want criminal punishment of the Defendant). 3. As such, the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit. Thus, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition