Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

On October 17, 2019, the Defendant reported from around 23:40 on October 17, 2019 to around 00:00 on the following day that the police officers belonging to the East Sea Police Station E zone of the East Sea were dispatched to the Defendant, by making a 112 report to the effect that the Defendant did not demand a smoke to smoke while riding in D taxi in front of the “C” located in B of the East Sea and was not demanded from the taxi engineer by smoking a disturbance, and that the said taxi engineer “I continue to smoke, and will not get off from the taxi.”

Since then, when the police officer stated the above taxi number in the work pocket book, the defendant saw that "I am, am, camping, and must interfere with official duties", and am to the above police officer, and tried to see that "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am." The above police officer sent the above taxi driver first to the above police officer for the purpose of the taxi business, "I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am." The above police officer tried to am the above police officer's shoulder by hand, and am. I am am. I am.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (verification of contents of video recorded in a criminal state);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that there is no past record of crimes exceeding the fine);