상습강제추행
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) around October 2010, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that, in light of the following: (b) around October 2010, the victim himself/herself and his/her name and resident registration number were written in writing, stating that he/she habitually committed sexual indecent act against the female members of the church, including L, and that (c) the victims were forced to commit indecent act by compulsion from the Defendant to the investigation agency and the court of the original instance; and (d) the victims made a statement to the effect that some female members of the above document were forced to commit indecent act by indecent act by compulsion from the Defendant at the investigation agency, the victims’ statement and the above written contents can be sufficiently recognized as credibility. In full view of the above, the Defendant can sufficiently recognize the facts of habitually indecent act by compulsion against the victims, as
However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the judgment.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged in this case begins with "C" (hereinafter referred to as "the church in this case") located on the second floor in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 1997. From around 2002, the defendant entered into a mutual relationship with "C" (hereinafter referred to as "the church in this case"), which is a member of the church in the above church, and called "B" as "B" to the victim F, who is a father of D, from time to time in the house of the above church x Dong x Dong x he was called as "B". At that time, the defendant started to attend the church in the above church in the front line of the above church in the year of 2008, and around 2013.
On the other hand, the Defendant, around 2010, held a counseling office of “C” in the Goyang-gu Gtel in Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, and provided consultation with the believers of the above church while resolving the mind through the method of “rawllefm.”
The Defendant from July 2010 to June 17, 2014.