2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

피고인은 2013. 7. 13. 22:00경 충남 부여군 C에 있는 ‘D주점’에서 피해자 E(여, 41세)와 대화를 하던 중 피해자와 친분이 있어 “이년아”라고 하였다가 이에 기분이 나빠진 피해자로부터 욕설을 듣게 되자 화가 나 손바닥으로 피해자의 왼쪽 뺨을 2회 때리고, 손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔들어 피해자를 바닥에 넘어뜨리고, 통증을 호소하던 피해자의 다리 부분을 발로 수 회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim, who is in need of treatment for about 8 weeks, the right-hand sponsor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to E and F;

1. Application of each statute in the medical certificate of injury and written opinion;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Scope of sentenced punishment: One month to seven years of imprisonment;

2. The sentencing criteria [decision of types] The group of violent crimes, the group of general bodily injuries (the scope of recommending sentences] and the area of aggravated punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months to two years: No special mitigation factor: The serious injury.

3. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment; and

4. Whether to suspend the execution or not: There is no negative reason that there is no positive reason for the suspension of the execution or two years [main reasons for the suspension of the execution] (general reasons for the suspension of the execution: There is no contingent crime, serious reflector, or negative reason that there is no criminal record of the suspension of the execution or more: The efforts to recover damage (comprehensive comparison and evaluation] earlier, by comprehensively taking into account the reasons for the main behavior, reasons for the general reference, and all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, the probation and community service order shall be sentenced to