If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months in prison by this court for the crime of interference with business, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2014.

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant, at around 23:00, damaged the victim’s property owned by the Defendant by putting the victim a bath before the restaurant “D” operated by the Victim C, without any reason, while drunking it in front of the restaurant, putting the glass entrance on a hand at a place outside of the store where the plastic chairs are gathered, breaking it up and breaking it out, thereby damaging the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution on the on-site photographs and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.