When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) provided D (W), in return for sexual intercourse, to D (at 27 years of age) at the Estu-gu Estu-gu, Young-gu; and (b) provided sexual intercourse with his female on a single occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness D’s statutory statement legislation;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 21 (1) of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. While the alleged defendant was traveling a business trip on the day of the instant case, there was only a fact that the defendant met D with the court of first instance and conversations within the defendant's vehicle, and there was no fact that the defendant had sexual intercourse with D with D as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the following circumstances are acknowledged: ① D was aware of the Defendant’s sexual intercourse from the investigative agency to this court; ② was aware of the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant 10,000 won, taking advantage of the cell phone hosting “E”, while she was living in the river on the day of the instant case; ② was consistently stated to the effect that D’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant 10,000 won in order to engage in sexual intercourse on the day of the instant case; ② D’s cell phone camera, which was prepared and kept in sexual intercourse with D, stated “FFFFF” (Evidence 24 pages). Accordingly, D’s investigative agency stated “FFD’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s own tending,” and “CFFD’s testimony” as evidence.