beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2020.01.30 2019고합50

강간

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2019, at around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that “the Defendant would introduce the land to make rape the victim; (b) laid the Defendant’s vehicle into the Defendant’s vehicle; and (c) went into the Defendant’s body at around 19:00 on the same day at around 19:00, the Defendant exceeded the Defendant’s chest and added the victim’s chest to the victim’s sexual fingers; (b) inserted the victim’s fingers into the victim’s inner fingers; and (c) made the victim’s body into the victim’s back seat; and (d) inserted the victim’s chests and clothes into the victim’s inner fingers; and (e) made the victim’s body into the victim’s back seat; and (e) inserted the victim’s body into the victim’s back seat; and (e) made the victim’s rape into the victim’s inner part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made to C by the police;

1. Determination on the investigation report (Evidence Nos. 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11) (Evidence List Nos. 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11) and the

1. The gist of the argument is that the defendant tried to have the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse in the vehicle of the defendant, and the victim first rejected the victim's sexual intercourse, but the victim first rejected the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's sexual intercourse against the victim's will.

In addition, the Defendant did not put the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim by referring the victim’s 's bottom'.

2. We examine the judgment, which is duly adopted by this Court.