However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

On January 14, 2014, at around 22:16, the Defendant: (a) sought the victim’s head from the Da (the age of 36) of the building E, which was living together with the victim D (the age of 36), returned the card in the name of the Defendant used for the settlement of living expenses; (b) brought the victim’s horse dispute with the victim again; and (c) moved the victim’s head head knife from the inside to the ward; (d) moved the victim’s face and head from the inside to the ward; and (e) taken the victim’s head knife at the victim’s face and head; and (e) taken the victim’s head two times in the front of the small bank; and (e) taken the victim’s head knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. On-site photographs of victims, on-site photographs, diagnosis reports, and diagnosis reports of victims;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Nos. 6, 8, 9, 12, 14 through 16 of the evidence list);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the fact that there is no power to commit the same kind of crime, the fact that there is no power to punish the victim, confession, and reflect);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to the degree of injury, but it shall be renewed for reasons for discretionary mitigation as seen earlier);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;