A. Defendant A’s KRW 26 million and for this, 5% per annum from April 19, 2014 to August 23, 2016.

A. C received a supply of reinforced concrete construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) among the official construction works in the military unit located in Gangwon-gun D D, Gangwon-gun, Inc. (hereinafter “New Construction”), and the Plaintiff drafted a subcontract agreement with C on December 18, 2013, setting the construction period between December 18, 2013 and May 30, 2014 as the contract amount of KRW 837,000,000 (including value-added tax).

B. The Plaintiff is carrying out the instant construction project with C, E, Defendant B, etc., and after receiving a tax invoice issued by the Plaintiff from the supplier of the materials, etc. at the instant construction site, the Plaintiff submitted it to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff agreed to pay the price directly to the material supplier that issued the said tax invoice (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

C. According to the instant agreement, the Plaintiff: (a) received a tax invoice stating “Defendant A (F); (b) the Plaintiff; (c) the date of preparation; and (d) the amount of KRW 33,00,000 (30,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the supplier; (c) one tax invoice stating the amount of KRW 30,000 (30,000,000,000,000) from the supplier; (d) the supplier B (F; G); (e) the Plaintiff; and (e) the Plaintiff; and (e) the date of preparation; (e) January 10, 2014; and (e) the amount of KRW 32,74,80,00 (29,00,000,000; and (e) the amount of KRW 2,976,80,000) from each of the Defendant A on April 18, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 12, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the aforementioned facts of recognition and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the cause of the claim, Defendant A did not supply building materials, etc. equivalent to KRW 33 million at the construction site of this case, and Defendant A.