2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

On July 21, 2014, at around 17:20, the Defendant driving a D D D Corpon, leading to two-lane roads in front of the Friju station located in Gwangju Northern-gu E, along two-lanes from the direction of the home-plug.

At the time, the Defendant was under the duty of care to avoid collision with the victim I (the victim I (the 80-year-old age), who was leading the victim G (the 66-year-old) driver, and thus, in such a case, the person engaged in driving a motor vehicle was under the duty of care to avoid collision with the motor vehicle driver by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes while making the front door well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the back part of the passenger vehicle from the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “the first accident”), and the victim G was unable to accurately operate the steering and brakes due to the shock, and the victim G was driving in the future at a rapid speed by raising the speed (hereinafter “the second accident”), and the victim I was faced with the front part of the passenger vehicle (hereinafter “the second accident”), continuing to run in the future by the said taxi, while driving in the future, the part of the victim J (41) (hereinafter “the third accident”), which continued to run in the future with the front part of the passenger vehicle (hereinafter “the third vehicle accident”), and the Defendant received the back part of the passenger vehicle from the victim L(the 46 years old), who was parked in the front part, with the front part of the cargo vehicle, and received the back part of the passenger vehicle from the victim L(the 46-year-old bus) who was parked in the front part, with the front part of the passenger vehicle, and received the first passenger vehicle from the P No. 1 in Q Home (hereinafter “the first accident”).

(hereinafter “the fifth accident”). Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, inflicted injury on the victim G, such as cerebral sugars that require approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and on the part of the victim I, she suffered injury, such as the recovery of unstable frames that require approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment.