beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.05 2013노4115

위증

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal stated to the effect that “the Defendant first made contact from F on April 8, 2012,” was erroneous, and that the Defendant may be punished for perjury if he reverses his continuous testimony in the court on April 8, 2012, and that C may be punished for perjury, and that it is true that C may be released from the suspension of indictment of F, who is not guilty, and that there is no false statement contrary to memory, such as what is written in the facts charged.

However, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

(1) The grounds for appeal submitted by the Defendant on January 27, 2014, the deadline for submitting the grounds for appeal, are only erroneous grounds for appeal, and the Defendant’s attorney’s written opinion submitted on May 19, 2014, changed to the maximum extent permitted by the Act and added to the assertion on unreasonable sentencing. However, this cannot be deemed a legitimate ground for appeal as it was filed after the deadline for submitting the grounds for appeal has expired. Accordingly, the allegation contained in the said written opinion by the defense counsel is limited to the extent that supplements the grounds for appeal to the extent that supplements the Defendant’s grounds for

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts are acknowledged.

(1) On February 3, 2010, the Defendant, as a member of the business of I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”), stated to the effect that “The Defendant was investigated by the police in collusion with the representative director C, etc. of the instant company for an act of fund-raising, etc., and that “The instant company was making a payment of profits to investors despite the fact that the instant company received an investment and sustained losses from trading,” and “the Defendant, etc. received money by collusion.”

Even though it is not possible to guarantee the weak profits and principal, profits are created by stock trading, etc.