소유권이전등기말소 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for alteration or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept
The third to 8~15 of the judgment of the first instance is conducted.
A. Around December 9, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the amendment of the Real Estate Sale Contract for the instant Contract with Defendant D (hereinafter “instant amendment agreement”). Article 1 of the instant amendment agreement provides that “The Plaintiff and Defendant D, upon a request for re-contract due to reasons attributable to the Plaintiff, shall terminate the instant contract, and shall agree on the terminated contract with the same content as Defendant E, F, G, and H, the representative director of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Defendant E”) and that the Plaintiff shall succeed the purchase price of KRW 300 million paid to Defendant D, and that the Plaintiff shall not demand any rights or compensation against Defendant D.
Article 2 (Settlement) provides that "any non-performance special agreement of the plaintiff after the conclusion of this Agreement shall be succeeded by the defendant E and three other parties and shall be performed by the deadline for the agreement."
“A part of the land I to be transferred free of charge under the sales contract shall be subject to the establishment of a permanent approval or easement to Defendant D before the separation, and shall be transferred to Defendant D or to a person designated by Defendant D or Defendant D without compensation until the end of 2017.
In Articles 3 and 3 (Effect and Other), the term “this Agreement shall enter into force immediately and shall lose its effect upon the violation of the said Article which the Plaintiff and Defendant D have agreed.”
The following shall not be deemed to have been null and void if the agreement to modify the case was followed by the 5th instance judgment. Accordingly, the agreement to modify the case was added.
v. 6. The plaintiff is under the last sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the plaintiff is under the defendant D in Article 2.