However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was parked at the entrance of the Gun Medical Center located in the Gun Medical Center located in 01:00, 01:00 on December 1, 2016; (b) on the ground that the Defendant reported the Defendant, and reported the Defendant to the hospital, the fire fighting staff E (28 years old) belonging to the Gun Fire Station D (28 years old) belonging to the Gun Fire Station of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant took a bath view on the ground that the Defendant was a victim who was going back to the hospital and sent back to the hospital; and (c) on his hand, the victim’s right chest was flick at one time; and (d) the Defendant’s act was taken using the video function of the cell phone.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the 119 dispatch of fire officers and the dispatch of patients.

『2017 고단 234』 피고인은 2017. 1. 31. 21:10 경 군산시 조 촌 2길 24에 있는 풍미 정 음식점 앞길에서부터 같은 시 조 촌 2길 34에 있는 교동 짬뽕 앞길에 이르기까지 약 100m 구간에서 혈 중 알콜 농도 0.075% 의 술에 취한 상태로 F 레 조 승용차를 운전하였다.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 133"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Video CDs;

1. Investigation report (related to the process of photographing cellphone images) 2017 top class 234;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of reports on the circumstances of drivers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the crime (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although the nature of the crime of this case was not less than that of the crime of this case in use of violence against firemen who performed official duties in the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and other all circumstances leading to the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc.