beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.21 2019나2000232

업무방해 등

Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the court of first instance partially renders the reasons

(The main sentence of Article 420). [Attachment 420 of the Civil Procedure Act] : 12.6 to 7. Of the reasons in the judgment of the first instance: part of 12.5 : "A plaintiff D and defendant B appealed against this case and filed an appeal with Seoul High Court No. 2018Na2021508, Dec. 21, 2018; 15.12 to 13 : 7.0 of the reasons in the judgment of the first instance, "No. 22 : 16.10 of the 10th 7th 16th 7th 7th : 5th 5th 60 of the 196th 10th 10th 16th 10 of the 19th 20th 16th 27th 27th 10 of the 196th 20th 207th 202 of the 19th 20th 3th 16th 2.

Plaintiff D and E claimed the scope of damages due to unlawful acts, such as the obstruction of the Defendants’ business, attempted litigation fraud, etc., caused property damages that exceed KRW 489,665,120 as construction cost, without obtaining the expected profit from the sale of the instant apartment units.

However, the plaintiff D and E shall be liable for damages in consideration of some negligence of the parties, such as delay in the payment of the construction cost, respectively.