However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 26, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million with fines of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act on August 8, 2012.

On August 20, 2020, at around 22:15, the Defendant driven a D A6 car in the state of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of 0.045% from the front day of the mutual influorial sium in Gwangju Northern-gu to the front day of C located in the same Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Application of one copy of inquiry report and summary order, such as criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.