beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.02.14 2011가단30236

손해배상

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,500,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 2, 2009 to February 14, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 10, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant purchase contract”) with Nonparty I, who called Nonparty E, F, and the Defendant (G Real Estate) on the part of the Plaintiff, who is a seller’s agent of the said D Real Estate, to purchase 43.68 square meters of reinforced concrete structure of the 301 square meters of the 301st apartment house of the 4th floor of the Seoul Northernbuk-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant real estate”), which was newly constructed on the J site, in the presence of Nonparty I, the seller’s agent of the seller, I, the buyer, the Plaintiff, the selling price of the 190 million won in the sales contract (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The sales contract (A) drafted at that time, stated that the sales contract (A) stated the seller’s agent of the seller’s agent, I, the purchaser, the 190 million won in the sales price, and KRW 190 million in the sales price.

B. The Plaintiff deposited KRW 50,00,000 to H as the purchase price of the instant real estate, KRW 1,00,000 on May 12, 2008, KRW 19,000 on May 19, 2008, KRW 10,000 on June 30, 2008, KRW 10,000 on July 2, 2008, KRW 11,000 on July 11, 2008, and KRW 5,00,000,000 on December 15, 2008, KRW 7169 on the instant real estate, which was approved for use on February 6, 200, KRW 100,000,000 on the collateral security (the maximum debt amount of KRW 30,000,000 on July 1, 209, the debtor was established as Seoul Northern District Court No. 7169 on the same day.

C. On May 24, 2009, the Plaintiff reduced the purchase price of this case to KRW 145 million on G real estate operated by the Defendant, including the Defendant, E, and H. However, 70 million among them, there was an agreement that the Plaintiff succeeds to the secured obligation of the first mortgage of this case, and the Defendant, after completing the agreement on the date, has agreed on the said date, agreed to reduce the price for text messages to the Plaintiff.