However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B with low engine.

On June 14, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car with alcohol content of 0.138% during blood transfusion around 05:00 and moved to the boundary of “Sulsan Airport” located in the boundary of Ulsan-gu, Northern-gu, Ulsan-do.

At the time, the center line was installed in the front line, so in this case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to those engaged in driving service, to verify the location of the center line well, and to safely make a round inside his lane.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving a road boundary line installed on the left side of the road and frighted to the center line due to its shock, and the part of the front driver of the victim C(57) who was waiting in the signal waiting at a one-lane in the moving direction at the time was faced with the front driver part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front, and the above vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the traffic at the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the traffic at the next time.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim C’s occupational negligence the injury of salt and tension in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, and the injury of the victim E, such as salt and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving a motor vehicle with approximately 6km section from the intersection of “the entrance of a drinking village” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do at the time of the day indicated in the preceding paragraph to “the upper school distance” located in the same dong of the same Gu during blood alcohol concentration of about 0.138%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.C and E respective statements 1.