However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 12:00 on September 27, 2013, the Defendant: “E” workplace operated by the victim D (the 49-year-old) in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, on the grounds that the victim and his wife in the preceding day are threateninging and threatening the Defendant and his wife, and thereby the Defendant was found to have damaged the victim’s property equivalent to the sum of the market price and the repair cost of the 7 million won of the victim’s property by taking the front side of the Fbenz motor vehicle owned by the victim who was parked in the parking lot that he was driving. The Defendant continued to cut the knick from his knife to his own knife, and cut the knife into the victim’s office. The Defendant destroyed two times the office doors, and then damaged the market price and the repair cost of the knife vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that it is more than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the victim's intimidation to the family members of the defendant, as the victim would inflict harm on the defendant's family members, and deposit KRW 3,012,00 with compensation for damages).