Perjury in perjury is established by a witness who has lawfully taken an oath under law to make a statement contrary to his memory, and even if his testimony is consistent with objective facts, when he makes a statement contrary to his memory, the establishment of perjury does not affect the establishment of perjury, and whether such testimony is an essential matter of the relevant case, and the outcome of the trial has no relation with the establishment of perjury.

Examining each evidence of the judgment of the court below and the judgment of the court of first instance compared with the records, it is sufficient to recognize the criminal facts against the defendant in the first trial of the judgment of the court of first instance, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts against the rules of evidence or by misapprehending the legal principles

Now, the author argues that it is merely unreasonable to criticize the selection of evidence or fact-finding or to interpret the legal principles of perjury, which is the exclusive authority of the fact-finding court.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee Jae-hee (Presiding Justice)