The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of

The argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to investigation procedures and trial procedures in the first instance court is justified, since the defendant alleged in the ground of appeal that he did not regard it as grounds for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as subject to ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.