When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the victim B (the 22 years of age, South) and is not aware of it.

From 10:05 on January 2, 2018 to 10:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) visited the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council member and “D” Council member; and (b) cut off the victim’s market value by having one ecco-ray equivalent to KRW 30,000, which is the victim’s own market value; and (c) at the same time, cut off the victim with one PEP equivalent to KRW 300,00,000, equivalent to KRW 1,80,000, KRW 1,50,000, KRW 465,000, such as two USB connecting lines, which are equivalent to KRW 5,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 329 of the choice of punishment (the selection of fine, the fact that the defendant acknowledges his mistake, the fact that all damaged articles were returned to the victim, and the defendant had a number of penal power, such as the records of punishment by a fine for the same kind of crime, etc., the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order of this case is deemed appropriate, and thus, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order of this case shall be determined as per Disposition).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;