In accordance with the selection of the parties in this court, the first instance judgment, “Defendant B,” “Defendant C,” “Defendant C,” and “Defendants,” respectively, shall be subject to the appointment of the parties.

The following shall be added to the three-way first instance judgment following the first instance judgment:

“E. The Defendant was indicted with summary facts of violating the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act by displaying and selling the clothing produced by imitateing the instant drama together with the designated parties, and was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by a fine of KRW 2,00,000 on August 8, 2019. The Defendant claimed formal trial against the above summary order, but on January 30, 2020, the said court convicted the Defendant of a fine of KRW 2,00,000 (Seoul Central District Court 2019Da1776). The Defendant appealed against the above judgment and continued the appellate court with the Seoul Central District Court 2020No456. The Appoint was charged with the same criminal facts as the Defendant stated in the foregoing paragraph e., but the profits derived from the sale was relatively less than the profit of the Defendant’s husband, and the Defendant’s husband was punished by the Defendant’s criminal charge of KRW 31 through 37,2019.”

The "Evidence Nos. 16, 17, and 1, 4, 5, 9, and 10 of the first instance judgment" shall be written with "Evidence Nos. 16, 17, 33 through 35, and Eul Nos. 1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 15, and 16 of the first instance judgment."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just based on the conclusion with this court, but the defendant and the selector appointed the defendant in this court can maintain the judgment of the first instance.