1. On August 5, 2016, at around 06:45, the Defendant: (a) carried out the entrance door gate gate of supervision office with a pipeline of approximately 70cm in length, which is a dangerous object at the construction site, when the door gate gate gate gate gate gate was replaced; (b) the Defendant damaged the door gate gate gate of supervision office with a pipe of about 70cm in length, which is a dangerous object at the construction site.

2. The Defendant attempted to intrude a structure with an entrance door at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), and attempted to intrude a structure managed by the supervision unit of the victim D, but failed to do so due to no door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. E statements;

1. On-site photographs, etc. [the defendant and his/her defense counsel held the qualification as a general supervisor of the D Supervision Group at the time of the instant case, since the dismissal of D on August 3, 2016 against the defendant was unfair, as the dismissal of D was conducted by D on August 3, 2016.]

In addition, while the defendant intended to enter the office of this case in order to carry out normal business affairs, as the door gate is replaced, E, a supervisory officer of D, was dismissed from the company on August 3, 2016 and affixed the next day.

8. 4. The defendant did not comply with an order to take over the business at an office of supervision but replaced the door of the office with the same day as the defendant does not enter;

was stated.

The defendant asserts that the act of the defendant is a legitimate act of Article 20 of the Criminal Code because the pipe gate gate was damaged at the site and the act of the defendant does not violate social rules.

Therefore, the term "act that does not violate the social rules and regulations" in Article 20 of the Criminal Code is placed in the spirit of the whole legal order or in its surroundings.