However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 22, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around February 22, 2014, around 22:27, the Defendant: (b) under the influence of alcohol in the D Smarket operated by the victim C (the age of 32) located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, left the floor of the venue, and prevented customers who had entered the said space by getting out of the column, such as “a resolution by money” and “a great sound.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business operations for about 10 minutes by force.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and place of the entry in the preceding paragraph, and the police officer F belonging to the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station E District District, who was called out after receiving 112 report, attempted to arrest the Defendant in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense, and broken down the sunlight of the year for a vehicle equivalent to 40,000 won on the back of the patrol car parked in front of the said place, which is attached to the rear door of the patrol car No. 23 of the said district.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the patrol car, which is the object used by public offices, to be 40,000 won repair cost, such as the replacement of sunlight lights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Written statements of C and F;

1. Application of statutes to field photographs and photographs of patrol vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 141(1) and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for an offense, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that an agreement has been made with a victim interfering

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act to order probation and lecture attendance;