2. The fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method of crime, degree of participation, and the amount of fraud by the defendant, and that it does not reach an agreement with the victim G is an unfavorable circumstance.

However, there are more favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the actual gains that the Defendant acquired through each of the instant crimes appear to be too much, the damage to the victim K was considerably recovered, and the said victim wanted to take a preference against the Defendant, and the fact that equity should be considered with the case of concurrent judgment, including the case of fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive.

In this context, considering the various circumstances shown in the records and arguments such as the character, character, environment, etc. of the defendant, since the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant cannot be deemed unfair, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, ex officio correction of "the second paragraph (c)" in Article 3 (b) 1 of the Criminal facts part of the judgment of the court below to "the second paragraph (b)"