On January 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul High Court for the violation of the Public Official Election Act, for perjury, for six months of imprisonment, and for one year of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 27, 2014.

The Defendant, who was implemented on April 11, 2012, was in charge of managing and operating the E election fund as the core leader of the E election campaign elected as a candidate for the D Party in C constituency at the 19th National Assembly member election, which was implemented on April 11, 2012. F and G, as an election campaign worker who was not registered from March 29, 2012 to April 3, 2012, intended to engage in the above E election campaign, and were paid 4.20,000 won in cash in return for such election campaign, as an election campaign worker registered from April 4, 2012 to April 10, 2012, and received 4.90,000 won in return.

The Defendant was indicted for violating the Public Official Election Act such as 4.20,000 won under the pretext of allowances, actual expenses, and other compensation for volunteer service, etc. to F, who was not registered, and had been tried at the Seoul High Court in order to conceal the fact that the Defendant paid cash to F, the Defendant got paid to F during the appellate trial trial on November 201, 2013, saying, “F was not paid for the period during which he was able to participate in an election campaign as a volunteer at the instant coffee shop located in Pyeongtaek-si and H, or did not receive allowances in return for the said period during which he was allowed to do so as a volunteer.”

Therefore, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath with F on November 28, 2013 at the Seoul High Court Decision 302, the Seoul High Court Decision 157, the Seocho-gu Seoul High Court, at the first instance court of Seocho-gu, 157, as a witness of the appellate court, such as the above violation of the Public Official Election Act against the Defendant in the above court of Seoul High Court Decision 2013No2432, etc., and the Defendant stated “A’s main body that was discovered at the time of search and seizure of A’s residence as the name (F) of the witness and stated “420,000 (original)” and “on the face of A’s main body that was discovered at the time of search and seizure.”