If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

At around 01:45 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant argued that the Defendant was frightening to female players at the seat next to the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant was frightened by the Defendant, and that the Defendant was against the violence of the victims, led the victims E (the age of 39) to live in a breath, led the victim E (the age of 39) to tear the clothes, fright the Defendant into the part of the unexploded number of treatment days, flap the arms, flap the arms, and flap the horses of the victim F (the age of 35) into the floor, and flae the fel and knee part of the chest and left knee part of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on standing photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;