A. The recognition of Defendant C, at around 17:40 on February 6, 2016, driven a D car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driven a two-lane road in front of the corporate bank located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, along two-lanes from the long-speed distance to the long-speed distance from the edge of the bus, and entered a two-lane by using the Defendant vehicle while driving a one-lane and two-lane to change the course to the one-lane, without confirming that the FOba (hereinafter “the network”), driven by E following the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “the network”).

Accordingly, in order to avoid the collision with the Defendant’s vehicle, E, which was proceeding on the top of the vehicle, has plucked up to the right side of the direction of the Deceased’s Otoba, collisioned with the fences front of the vehicle’s seat parked on the right side of the two-lanes, and continued to conflict with the two-lanes of the vehicle’s seat, which was parked on the front, after the driver’s seat of the vehicle parked on the front, and became over the road.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (2) Due to the instant accident, E died of a serious plehy damage (hereinafter “E”) due to the instant accident.

3) Plaintiff A is the father of the deceased, Plaintiff B is the mother of the deceased, and the Defendant KB damage insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant KB damage insurance”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap evidence 2, 12, Eul evidence 1 and 3 (including all evidence attached with a serial number), Gap evidence 9-1 through 10, Eul evidence 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above recognition of liability, Defendant C as the driver of the Defendant vehicle, barring special circumstances, as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle.