If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[Criminal Power] On June 28, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on July 6, 2013 by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapon, etc.), at the Suwon District Court’s House, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 6, 2013, and is currently in the grace period.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 00:40 on December 13, 2014, the Defendant was under influence of alcohol in the F F F-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, and then was asked by H and assistant I about the circumstances during which he was sent to the vehicle after receiving 112 a report, and then asked the above police officers questions about the circumstances during which he was divingd from H and assistant I of the Seoul Mine Police Station G police box called the said vehicle. The above I’s face part of the H’s face, which the Defendant tried to continuously arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, was sent to the right down of the said H as soon as possible after he was sent to the Defendant at one time on his horse.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' 112 reports and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the victim H(54 years of age) was forced to leave the right side to which the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each statement of J, K and I, each statement of complaint of each H, and each statement;

1. Investigation report (related to reports on the actual state of attendance at the site and on the use of suspected equipment and gear);

1. Photographs;

1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental retardation at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant is drunk at the time of the crime of this case.