A. The sentence of the lower court (a year of imprisonment, an additional collection of KRW 206,00) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. It is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, against whom all of the crimes of this case are committed, and that the defendant submitted a reply to the inquiry that he reported a narcotic offender G at the court below, and that he provided an additional reply to the inquiry about the fact that he reported a narcotic offender L at the court below.

However, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, it seems difficult to change the sentence of the court below even if considering the achievements of additional investigation.

Considering the above circumstances and other factors, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too weak or too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. Thus, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.