However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the deck in C Trawls' D (491 ton), and the victim E (56) is the head of the agency referred to in the above D.

On September 10, 2016, at a restaurant in the above D subparagraph where the Defendant was anchored in a country located in the Si of Africa, the Defendant talked with the Defendant on the deck G and the method of using traws with the victim and the victim belonging to the same ship company who was anchored in D, on the ground that: (a) the victim talks with the Defendant to the effect that “the Defendant would not speak the captain of the method of using the scambry, because the Defendant’s age is her deck, deck career is low, and so on; and (b) the victim’s talks with the Defendant to the effect that “the captain would not speak the captain of the method of using the scambrying”, the Defendant putting the scambine, which is a dangerous object on the scambling of the victim, and continued to cut back the back of the victim’s body one time and the body of the victim’s body, such as the victim’s hair and the body of the victim’s body necessary for treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant used dangerous objects to inflict bodily injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Consideration of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that there is no same record since 1999, the fact that the victim deposited 3 million won for the victim after the closure of pleadings, and the fact that the crime is seriously against the will be committed;