On December 6, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 12:00, and led to the two-lanes between the two-lanes from Kintex to Kimpo-sections, the road near the northwest-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the vehicle in front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to safely drive the steering and the system accurately

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence, driven a vehicle while driving the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, was driven by the victim D(66) with a view to stopping the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s frightion and received the part of the frighter in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as finites, requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and at the same time destroyed the damaged vehicle to have approximately KRW 3,743,578 of repair cost.

2. Each of the facts charged of this case is a case for which a prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since a written agreement was submitted by the victim D, the defendant’s intent not to be punished after the prosecution of this case was presented, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.