beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.09.02 2015고단920

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Until July 2, 2000, the Defendant served as the head of the Seoul Cooperatives B branch located in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and on September 23, 2015, the Jeonju District Court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 30, 2015.

Around August 12, 1998, the Defendant: (a) had the intent to take out the money under the name of E with the Defendant’s periodical deposits deposited in the name of E as collateral; (b) had the intent to withdraw the money; and (c) had no authority to exercise it; (d) had the Defendant’s seal attached to the “18 million won” and “E” address in the form of the loan transaction agreement; and (e) has forged one copy of the loan transaction agreement in the name of E, a private document on the rights and obligations; (b) submitted to F of the said Livestock Cooperative branch as if it was a document duly formed, and used it from that time to January 12, 2000; and (c) had the Defendant forged the loan transaction agreement in the same manner as the attached list of crimes, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol of the accused;

1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The president of the H’s complaint;

1. A copy of the complaint filed by I;

1. Follow-up notification of measures;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A copy of each letter of loan for consumption or of loan transaction agreement;

1. A copy of each judgment;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (report on the results of confirmation before and after disposition, judgment of the first instance court and report on the attachment of general contents of cases);

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act competition among the crimes of uttering of a falsified investigative document;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes;