C. Around August 2016, Defendant C, an advertising company, filed a claim for damages with H on the same ground as the cause of the instant claim, on the grounds that Defendant C’s truck sale advertisements were identical to that of the instant claim, and withdrawn the lawsuit against H as of September 1, 2017.

A. On the I Internet PP and J homepage, the following contents of truck sales advertisement (hereinafter referred to as “the advertisement of this case”) were made to be posted. Items 25 tons of 25 tons of rollers-mor synthetic resin model/st-end synthetic resin model: 25 tons of rollers/201: On the spot working hours: On Sundays, on the day of day duty: on Sundays: on the day of day duty: on Sundays: on the day of day duty: on the day of KRW 9 million of pure subsidy, KRW 1.4 million: on the day of day duty: on the day of KRW 1.42 million of pure subsidy: on the day of KRW 1.42 million and on the day of day duty * on the day of day duty and transportation * on the day of day duty 1.5 million of monthly sales 1.5 million of direct vehicles * on the day of day duty, on the day of day duty of day duty, the day of day duty of day duty: on the day of day duty of day duty: The day duty of day duty of day duty of day duty of day duty of day duty of day duty of day duty of day.

B purchased 1,000,000 won in an account under the name of Defendant C as the down payment on September 8, 2016, in accordance with the orders of Defendant C, and the same year.

9. On the other hand, Defendant C, a trucking trader, sought a seller of the instant 1 truck through L, a trucking broker, to intermediate the sale and purchase of the instant 1 truck.

It paid KRW 144,00,000 to the nominal account.

2) After that, Plaintiff A on September 2016.