The punishment sentenced by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have committed the crime of this case in favor of the defendant, such as: (a) the defendant set up the 19 game machine, which is a speculative machine, to provide for the use of the unspecified number of customers; and (b) the remaining 4,500 won after deducting 10% of the commission, by converting the above customers to 5,000 won per point obtained through the game machine; and (c) exchange the outcome obtained through the use of the game; and (d) exchange the outcome obtained through the use of the game; and (e) engaging in the speculative business; and (e) the defendant recognized the crime of this case

However, it is difficult to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is unreasonable, considering the following circumstances: (a) the number of the game machine installed by the defendant was not small in 19 times; (b) the size of the game room was not small; and (c) the crime of this case was committed again during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime; and (d) there is no change in circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below; and (b) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct,

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.