beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.22 2015나26292

부당이득금반환

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for correction, modification, or addition as follows, among the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The parts corrected, changed, or added;

A. Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is corrected as E.

B. On the third page of the judgment of the first instance court, the “after transfer of inherited real estate” was changed to the “after transfer of inherited real estate on November 15, 2010” and the “after the transfer of the house on October 6, 201” under the 14th sentence is changed to the “after the transfer of the house on October 6, 201” and the “after the transfer of the house on October 201.”

C. The phrase “Article 45-2(2)1 and 1 of the Framework Act on National Taxes” as stated in Sections 4 through 16 of the first instance judgment shall be corrected to “Article 45-2(2)1 and 2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes.”

No. 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The same shall also apply to cases where the part of the transfer income tax for the year 2007 was refunded after the act of reporting transfer income tax on the instant stocks made around 2007 through 2008.”

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.