If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 23:58, 2012, the Defendant sent a complaint to the police officer working in the situation at the Seopo Police Station C District "B is a person who is a Do hospital, who is a patrol route up to the patrol route." On February 23:58, 2012, the Defendant threatened him/her with a cell phone that he/she had in his/her possession with "Iskn't go through until the week" as he/she had a cell phone slope E, E, E, E, and E, and E, sent him/her back to the earth, and returned home from the earth, and expressed his/her desire to "Isk or fl's typ, fl's typ, fl', this bl'tt, and the reasons why the police officer, who was working in the situation, was able to go on the taxi by the week."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers working in the global situation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning data capturing CCTV images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Since the defendant asserted that he was in a state of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, the records show that he was in a state of mental disorder. The defendant is recognized as having a little drinking at the time of the crime of this case, but it cannot be seen that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to such lack of ability in light of the defendant's reputation, the background leading up to the crime, the method and method of the crime, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case. Thus,