The judgment below

In light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, it is just that the court below acknowledged the establishment of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by applying Article 5-4 (5) and (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 329 of the Criminal Act with regard to the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.