(a)be as shown in the annexed sheet of the claim;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession based on recognition (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to claims against Defendant B, E, and F

A. On August 5, 2014, on the basis of the underlying facts 10:10:15, 2014, the non-indicted 1 asked the Plaintiff to misrepresentate the employee in charge of the corporate bank and the inspection, and called “the Plaintiff’s passbook has to deposit all the money in the passbook because the Plaintiff’s passbook became a year in the case, and the money has been deposited in the passbook.” However, the Plaintiff’s account was not connected to the case, and the non-indicted 1 was neither an employee in charge of the corporate bank nor an inspector. 2) The Plaintiff’s name and the non-indicted 1’s account at the post office (G) account (H) in the name of the Plaintiff’s name at the end of the above false statement, deposited all KRW 5,720,00,000 with the Defendant’s new cooperation account (I) account in the name of the Defendant E, KRW 5,850,000, KRW 000, KRW 2000, KRW 800 (Korean) account under the name of the Defendant F.

3) On the other hand, Defendant E and F received an investigation from an investigative agency on suspicion that they participated as accomplices in the instant fraud of those who were named in the instant criminal act (U.S. District Prosecutors’ Office 2014 typed typed 72481), and stated to the effect that they were issued cash cards and passwords of each of the above accounts to an unwritten person on August 4, 2014 or around August 4, 2014, as the lending Counseling Institute was assigned for the purpose of obtaining a loan. On November 26, 2014, Defendant E and F was subject to a non-prosecution disposition (Evidence of evidence) by the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office 2013 typed 47954 (No. 2013 typed 47954) without any grounds for recognition.