A Imprisonment with prison labor for a term of one year and six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A is a person who served as the head of the Seoul East District Office of Education, the head of the Seoul District Office of Education, the head of the Seoul District Education Training Institute, etc., from September 2006 to retired from office on August 31, 2009, and thereafter retired from office on August 31, 2009. Defendant C is a person who was an instructor of the J University Education Graduate School from August 2013, and Defendant B is a person who retired from office as a art teacher around February 2009 and operated a private art institute until December 201.

1. On August 21, 2007, the Defendants’ co-principal Defendant B’s co-principal employment of the victim L at the coffee shop near the Defendant’s house located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a private secondary or secondary school teacher located in Seoul Metropolitan Government. First of all, 70 million won should be given and 30 million won should be additionally given to the appointment as a regular teacher.

Defendant A said to the effect that Defendant A would employ the victim’s father as a private school teacher at his own seat of KRW 70 million through Defendant C, and Defendant A said to the effect that he would have the victim’s father as a private school teacher.

However, at the time of fact, Defendant A worked as the principal of I High School, who was a public school principal, was not in a position or authority to employ the victim’s dependent children as a regular teacher of a private school. Even if receiving money from the victim, Defendant B and C intended to use money for personal purposes not related to the employment of the teacher of a private school. Also, Defendant B and C attempted to divide KRW 10 million out of KRW 70 million received from the victim into their own, and Defendant B attempted to use it for personal purposes by separately receiving KRW 30 million (the difference between KRW 10 million and KRW 70 million) from the victim as a regular teacher. The Defendants did not have the intent or ability to employ the victim’s dependent children as a regular teacher of a private school even if they received money from the victim.

The Defendants conspired with each other in two or more order to induce the victim, thereby deceiving the victim from the victim, i.e., the Defendant B from the seat to the check.