However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is between the victim B ( South, 41 years of age) and his relative.

On August 1, 2016, at around 22:10 on August 1, 2016, the Defendant, “D” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, called “D,” that the victim, while drinking alcohol with the victim, was under the influence of alcohol, had the victim talked that he would open a day,” and that the victim’s head was fluor, which is a dangerous object that he or she had boomed, had the victim’s head one time, and had two parts in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution are deemed to have committed the crime of this case by contingency, and the victim is not willing to be punished by the defendant, there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, occupation, family relationship, health status, circumstances after the crime, and the degree of injury as stated in the records and arguments shall be comprehensively considered. The punishment shall be determined as ordered in the same manner, taking into account various factors of sentencing as