도로법위반
Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.
On September 19, 2006, B, an employee of the Defendant, violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles of the road management authority by loading and operating freight exceeding 11.78 tons of the limitation on the operation of C, which exceeds 10 tons of C, owned by the Defendant at the Ulsan Highway Business Office, around 4 km from September 19, 2006, in relation to the duties of the Defendant.
2. Whether a summary order subject to review was issued and confirmed as to the above facts charged, the decision of commencement of review was made on September 3, 2009 with respect to the above summary order about approximately 2009 inventory 10 on the above net support 2009, and it was referred to the trial proceedings (the above net support 2009Sang 1305) and the judgment of innocence was rendered on October 14, 2009, and the fact that the judgment became final and conclusive on October 22, 2009 is significant in this court.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a final judgment, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to Article 326 subparagraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act.