Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who delivers a household and collects a waste.

1. At around 10:00 on January 7, 2020, the Defendant, at the separate collection place of Asan-si B apartment, stolen by means of a cresh in which the victim’s separate collection company’s “C company” D’s surveillance was neglected, and the resident’s separate collection box was posted and posted at the separate collection place, and carrying 30,000 won of the market price on the Defendant’s E-vehicle.

2. At around 11:10 on January 10, 2020, the Defendant cut off two travel bags with the victim’s market price equivalent to KRW 20,000,000, one person who is the reporter of the massage, and one timber bed, in the same manner as the above paragraph 1, at the separate collection site of Asan-si B apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of statutes of one copy of a contract for collection of recyclables to the police statement of D on-site photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment recognizes the Defendant’s act, and the fact that the damaged goods have been returned to the victim is favorable.

However, considering the value of stolen articles by the defendant and the fact that the defendant did not have the same criminal record, but has a record of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor due to the criminal record of the crime of fraud, it is difficult to view that the