beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.18 2018가단5128305

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a “F Contract” (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) between D and D that operates a stock company C (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”), whereby the Plaintiff is an owner of the non-party company, to ensure the operation of single-story warehouse facilities located in E and the fire damage, etc. caused by the fire of the goods in the Dong and custody.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) Nab warehouse facilities

The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s electric cable installation 1) filed an application for electric use of the instant building on or around October 2013, and accordingly, the Plaintiff and the Defendant installed electric wires from the electric poles to the instant building. 2) Of the electric wires installed, the electric wires connected from the electric poles to the place of electric use are referred to as “swit line,” the end of which is referred to as “swit line connection,” and the electric wires connected from the artificial line connection point to the artificial cover disposal within the electric use building are referred to as “swit line.”

In the connection point of the seal-based line, the seal-based line is reduced to the "human baby", and the seal-based line is fixed to the support unit, "strings for human use", and according to the defendant's standard work process, the seal-based line and the human-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-

The seal exhaust line from string to strings is fixed to a building by “news”, which is an electrical cable in the form of laying to rest at a specified distance (see attached Form 3). (3) Of the above facilities, the seal line and human patriotic persons are owned and managed by the Defendant, and the seal exhaust line are owned and managed by the Plaintiff (see Articles 30 and 33 of the basic terms and conditions of supply of the Defendant’s basic terms and conditions of supply). Accordingly, the Defendant installed the seal line and the string line, and the Plaintiff installed the seal exhaust line, respectively. The access of the seal line and the string line at the time did not use a string for connection, and racks the power line and racks it by using the test.