토지소유권확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the land of this case was owned by the Plaintiff’s conciliation division C from the State or his successor, the first situation of which was the first situation, died on July 23, 1962 and became an inheritance as in the annexed inheritance calculation sheet, and the Plaintiff solely inherited on October 21, 2015 following the agreement of the property inheritors. The Defendant is solely liable to confirm that the land of this case was owned by the Plaintiff on the ground that the ownership of the land of this case is unclear.
2. Since a title holder of land under the former Land Survey Decree (Ordinance No. 2, Aug. 13, 1912, 1912), the title holder of land under the said Ordinance shall acquire the pertinent land at his/her own discretion, if he/she was prepared by the Land Survey Board and circumstances the title holder or his/her heir in accordance with the former Land Survey Ordinance, and then the title holder or his/her heir shall be the owner of the relevant land, and the person who
(2) On May 4, 1965, the Plaintiff’s father G was registered as the owner on February 21, 1964, and on May 4, 1965, the registration of preservation of ownership was not made in the above G name, but on May 4, 1965, the Plaintiff’s address was indicated as Macheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do E, the legal domicile of the Plaintiff, and on 4,290 square meters adjacent to the land of this case, the title holder was the State, but the land was indicated as Macheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, the legal domicile of the Plaintiff, and on 4,290 square meters adjacent to the land of this case, the land of this case was pointed out by the title holder, but the land owner was recorded as Ma who was the owner of the land of this case as the State.